Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 31 Download : 13

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the direct effect of budget participation on the performance of local government officials and the moderating effect of budget transparency.


Research Method: The study was conducted using 138 respondents from a total population of 185 employees of the East Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government. The study was quantitative in nature, using moderated regression analysis with the help of SmartPLS 3.00.


Results and Discussion: The results of the study show that: 1) Budget participation has a positive and significant effect on the performance of government officials, and 2) Budget transparency does not strengthen the relationship between budget participation and the performance of government officials.


Implications: Future studies need to expand the scope of research variables such as organizational culture, leadership, and other factors.

Keywords

Participation Transparency Budget Government Apparatus Performance

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Adoe, M. H. (2025). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Aparat Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur dengan Pemoderasi Transparansi Anggaran. Journal of Economics Review (JOER), 5(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.55098/joer.v5i1.74
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Afthanorhan, A., Ghazali, P. L., & Rashid, N. (2021). Discriminant validity: A comparison of CBSEM and consistent PLS using Fornell & Larcker and HTMT approaches. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
  2. Aulad, A., Hidayati, N., & Junaidi, J. (2018). Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Aparat Pemerintah Daerah: Budaya Organisasi Dan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Moderating (Studi Empiris Pada Skpd Kota Malang). e_Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Akuntansi, 7(07).
  3. Budiyanto, E., & Mochklas, M. (2020). Kinerja karyawan ditinjau dari aspek gaya kepemimpinan, Budaya organisasi dan motivasi kerja (Pendekatan Riset). In: CV. AA. RIZKY.
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  5. Dillman, D. A. (2016). Moving survey methodology forward in our rapidly changing world: A commentary. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 31(3), 8.
  6. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). Corrigendum to “editorial partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance”[LRP 46/1-2 (2013) 1–12]. Long Range Planning, 47(6), 392.
  7. Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. In Multivariate data analysis (pp. 785-785).
  8. Halim, A. (2004). Akuntansi keuangan daerah.
  9. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
  10. Hayon, P. P., & Fitry, R. N. (2024). Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah Dan Dana Berimbang Terhadap Belanja Modal Kabupaten Dan Kota Di Provinsi Papua. Musamus Accounting Journal, 6(2), 39-48.
  11. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135.
  12. Idrus, S. H., Akib, H., & Kesuma, A. I. (2024). Optimalisasi Pelayanan Publik melalui Penerapan Prinsip Good Governance: Tinjauan dari Perspektif Lokal dan Global. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (online), 2194-2205.
  13. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In Corporate governance (pp. 77-132). Gower.
  14. Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26.
  15. Mahoney, L., LaGore, W., & Scazzero, J. A. (2008). Corporate social performance, financial performance for firms that restate earnings. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 2(1), 104-130.
  16. Mardiasmo, M. (2013). Assessing Accountability Of Performance Measurement System And Local Government Budgetary Management. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 4(3), 373—395-373—395.
  17. Mardiasmo, M. (2021a). Akuntansi sektor publik-edisi terbaru. Penerbit Andi.
  18. Mardiasmo, M. (2021b). Otonomi & manajemen keuangan daerah: edisi terbaru. Penerbit Andi.
  19. Milani, K. (1975). The relationship of participation in budget-setting to industrial supervisor performance and attitudes: a field study. The accounting review, 50(2), 274-284.
  20. Mustopadidjaya, A. (2002). the Public Policy Process Management. Formulation, Implementation and Evaluation of Performance, Jakarta: LAN.
  21. Nababan, N., & Sagala, C. F. (2025). Peran Warga Negara Dalam Mengawasi Transparansi Anggaran Publik Di Era Digital. Jurnal Masyarakat Hukum Pendidikan Harapan, 5(02).
  22. Natania, G., & Wirakusuma, M. G. (2021). The Effect of Participation in Budgeting on the Performance of Regional Government Officials with Organizational Commitment as a Moderation Variable. 6.
  23. Negara, S. (2006). Peraturan menteri dalam negeri (Permendagri) nomor 13 tahun 2006. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
  24. Nurkhasanah, I. (2019). Pengaruh Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia, Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi, Partisipasi Penganggaran, Pengawasan, Dan Komitmen Organisasi Pemerintah Desa Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang].
  25. Pambudi, A. S., & Hidayat, R. (2022). Kinerja Pengawasan Pelayanan Publik dalam Prioritas Nasional. Bappenas Working Papers, 5(2), 270-289.
  26. Putri Ayu, R., Yudi, Y., & Gowon, M. (2024). PENGARUH PARTISIPASI ANGGARAN TERHADAP KINERJA PEMERINTAH DAERAH DENGAN KOMITMEN ORGANISASI DAN BUDAYA ORGANISASI SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI (STUDI EMPIRIS PADA ORGANISASI PERANGKAT DAERAH (OPD) DINAS KABUPATEN BUNGO) Ilmu Akuntansi].
  27. RI, D. D. N. (2002). Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 29 Tahun 2002. In: Jakarta.
  28. Rosilawaty, E. (2019). PENGARUH PARTISIPASI PENYUSUNAN ANGGARAN, KEJELASAN SASARAN ANGGARAN, DAN BUDAYA ORGANISASI TERHADAP KINERJA PEMERINTAH DAERAH KABUPATEN PURWOREJO (Studi Empiris pada OPD Kabupaten Purworejo) Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang].
  29. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Pick, M., Liengaard, B. D., Radomir, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 1035-1064.
  30. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587-632). Springer.
  31. Setiyono, B. (2023). Birokrasi dalam perspektif politik dan administrasi. Nuansa Cendekia.
  32. Sihombing, F. A., & Syarvina, W. (2023). Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran, Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Pada Balai Wilayah Sungai Sumatera II Medan. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 2(3), 16-28.
  33. Soedarman, M., Nahas, J. R., & Puspita, D. A. (2023). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Aparatur Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Analisa Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan, 7(1), 94-101.
  34. Stephens, C. (2020). Transparency and Accountability in the World Bank: Internal Accountability Mechanisms and Their Failings.
  35. Sugiyono, S., & Lestari, P. (2021). Metode penelitian komunikasi (Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan cara mudah menulis artikel pada jurnal internasional). In: Alvabeta Bandung, CV.
  36. Surijadi H., & Tamaela E. Y., (2018). The Effect of Accountability, Transparency, Openness, Fairness and Competition on effectiveness and Efficiency of E-Procurement in Maluku Provincial Procurement Services Unit, Russian Journal of Agricutural and Socio Economic Sciences, 7(79), 113-122, https://rjoas.com/issue-2018-07/article_12.pdf
  37. Susilawati, R. (2023). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran dan Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Aparat Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Empiris pada Organisasi Perangkat Daerah Kabupaten Bogor) Periode 2019-2021 Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Pakuan].
  38. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48, 1273-1296.
  39. Tamaela E. Y., Pattiasina V., Daninapa M., Marani Y., Duri J. A., (2020). Regional Financial Monitoring Models With Community Participation And Public Policy Transparency As Moderators, International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(02), 4223-4232, https://www.psychosocial.com/index.php/ijpr/article/view/2194