Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 125 Download : 102

Main Article Content

Abstract

Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi tantangan utama dan strategi implementatif dalam reformasi birokrasi di negara berkembang, dengan fokus pada dimensi struktural, kultural, politis, serta peran kepemimpinan birokratik dan efektivitas strategi reformasi yang telah diterapkan.


Metode Penelitian: Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Sumber data diperoleh dari artikel ilmiah terindeks dan literatur relevan yang diterbitkan antara tahun 2018 hingga 2024 melalui basis data seperti Springer, Wiley, Emerald, dan Elsevier. Analisis dilakukan secara tematik untuk mengelompokkan dan mensintesis temuan berdasarkan fokus penelitian.


Hasil dan Pembahasan: Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa reformasi birokrasi di negara berkembang dihadapkan pada tantangan struktural yang kaku, budaya kerja yang patrimonial, serta intervensi politik yang tinggi. Kepemimpinan transformasional terbukti berperan penting dalam memfasilitasi perubahan. Strategi seperti desentralisasi, digitalisasi, dan manajemen kinerja dinilai efektif namun sangat bergantung pada konteks lokal.


Implikasi: Studi ini memberikan kontribusi teoritis dan praktis dengan menawarkan kerangka evaluatif reformasi yang bersifat holistik dan kontekstual. Temuan ini diharapkan dapat dijadikan dasar perumusan kebijakan dan praktik manajerial birokrasi yang lebih responsif dan berkelanjutan.

Keywords

reformasi birokrasi kepemimpinan transformasional sistemik strategi implementatif.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ansanai, Y., & Rasyid, A. (2025). Tantangan dan Strategi Reformasi Birokrasi di Negara Berkembang. Journal of Public Policy, 1(1), 60–73. Retrieved from http://jurnal.ppsuniyap.ac.id/index.php/jpp/article/view/92
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Appiah, D., & Abdulai, A.-G. (2022). Politicization of Bureaucracy BT - Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (A. Farazmand (ed.); pp. 9695–9702). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_682
  2. Bleiklie, I. (2018). New Public Management or Neoliberalism, Higher Education BT - Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions (pp. 1–6). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_143-1
  3. Callahan, R. F. (2017). Bureaucracy and Leadership BT - Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (A. Farazmand (ed.); pp. 1–7). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_622-1
  4. Carvalho, T. (2018). New Public Management and the Academic Profession BT - Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions (pp. 1–6). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_310-1
  5. Christensen, J. (2024). When bureaucratic expertise comes under attack. Public Administration, 102(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12905
  6. Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole‐of‐government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x
  7. Fakhrul, I. (2015). New Public Management (NPM): A dominating paradigm in public sectors. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 9(4), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajpsir2015.0775
  8. Hammerschmid, G., Van de Walle, S., Andrews, R., & Mostafa, A. M. S. (2019). New public management reforms in Europe and their effects: Findings from a 20-country top executive survey. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317751632
  9. Herbel, J. E. (2018). Administrative Reform BT - Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (A. Farazmand (ed.); pp. 221–227). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_1217
  10. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
  11. Ingrams, A. (2017). Bureaucratic Reform BT - Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (A. Farazmand (ed.); pp. 1–6). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_626-1
  12. Ingrams, A. (2022). Bureaucratic Reform BT - Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (A. Farazmand (ed.); pp. 1311–1316). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_626
  13. Inkina, S. (2018). Comparative Administrative Reforms BT - Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (A. Farazmand (ed.); pp. 1–8). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1276-1
  14. Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1995). Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. Annual Review of Psychology, 46(1), 237–264.
  15. Kirana, S. C., & Mawar, M. (2024). Strategi Penerapan Reformasi Birokrasi Pada Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Koperasi Dan Usaha Kecil Menengah Republik Indonesia. Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Negara, 2(3), 284–305. https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v2i3.1338
  16. Lapsley, I. (2022). Whatever happened to new public management? Financial Accountability and Management, 38(4), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12346
  17. Lestari, R. A. (2019). Reformasi Birokrasi Sebagai Pelayan Publik. Dinamika Governance: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.33005/jdg.v9i1.1421
  18. Lindaas, N. A., Anthun, K. S., & Magnussen, J. (2024). New Public Management and hospital efficiency: the case of Norwegian public hospital trusts. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10479-7
  19. Mensah, I. K. (2019). E-Government, Bureaucracy, and Institutional Reform BT - Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (A. Farazmand (ed.); pp. 1–15). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3863-1
  20. Musso, J. A., Weare, C., & Jackman, R. W. (2024). The many roads to reform: a configurational analysis of the conditions supporting performance management implementation. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 37(5), 630–648. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-08-2021-0195
  21. Myksvoll, T., Tatham, M., & Fimreite, A. L. (2022). Understanding bureaucratic support for coerced institutional change. Governance, 35(4), 1119–1138. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12647
  22. Nyadera, I. N., & Islam, M. N. (2020). Link Between Administration, Politics, and Bureaucracy BT - Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (A. Farazmand (ed.); pp. 1–8). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3903-1
  23. Parlina, R., Wijatmoko, S., & Syafutra, R. (2023). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Sektor Publik Menuju Birokrasi Modern. Musamus Journal of Public Administration, 6(1), 488–494. https://doi.org/10.35724/mjpa.v6i1.5321
  24. Peters, B. G. (2021). 1Understanding Comparative Bureaucracy. In B. G. Peters (Ed.), Administrative Traditions: Understanding the Roots of Contemporary Administrative Behavior (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198297253.003.0001
  25. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford university press.
  26. Pujiastuti, N., & Sumarni, S. (2023). Tantangan Reformasi Birokrasi Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance Di Indonesia. PREDIKSI: Jurnal Administrasi Dan Kebijakan, 22(3), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.31293/pd.v22i3.7508
  27. Schomaker, R. M. (2022). Revolution and Public Administration BT - Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (A. Farazmand (ed.); pp. 11595–11605). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_1227
  28. Shukla, G., Sikivou, P., & Moceisuva, A. (2020). New Public Management (NPM) Framework, Fiji Correction Services BT - Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (A. Farazmand (ed.); pp. 1–14). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_4322-1
  29. Ulfah, S. M. (2021). Agenda Reformasi Birokrasi Untuk Membebaskan Budaya Pungutan Liar. Journal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Pemerintahan, 6(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37304/JISPAR.V6I2.413